Causa Králík afişi
Film

Causa Králík (1980)

Özgün adı: Causa králík

1980-03-26 · CS
55%
Puan
2 oy

In an unusual, apolitical approach, director Jaromil Jires has fashioned a standard drama that features an older lawyer with failing health who goes to practice in the countryside. His series of odd court cases reveals more about the human condition than about law. In one of these litigations a wayward nephew has cheated his elderly aunt out of her savings. In court, the nephew insists the money was a gift, but his aunt explains she only gave him the money as a loan. Although the lawyer technically wins the case, everything of value seems lost in the meantime. His services are paid for in rabbits because the aunt has no currency, and in the end, the nephew cons his aunt into parting with her savings anyway. Other cases expose similar types of petty corruption.

Causa Králík özel yazısını oku →

Başrol oyuncuları

Tüm kadro ve ekip →
Miloš KopeckýMiloš KopeckýJUDr. LukášekMarie BrožováMarie Brožovábabička MárováJaroslav SatoranskýJaroslav SatoranskýJounMartin RůžekMartin Růžeksoudce JUDr. PetříkZlata AdamovskáZlata Adamovskásekretářka ZuzanaPavel ZedníčekPavel ZedníčekPastyříkAlena VránováAlena VránováLukáškováKarel AugustaKarel AugustaVránaVlastimil HašekVlastimil HašekChmelařVladimír HlavatýVladimír HlavatýChmelař, st.Jana AndresíkováJana AndresíkováChmelařováMarie MálkováMarie MálkováZdenička Vránová

Movie DNA

Yönetmen tercihi262418Oyuncu tercihi623694 · 413281 · 347050Ülke tercihiXcDönem tercihi1980

Causa Králík hakkında sık sorulanlar

Causa Králík ne hakkında?

In an unusual, apolitical approach, director Jaromil Jires has fashioned a standard drama that features an older lawyer with failing health who goes to practice in the countryside. His series of odd court cases reveals more about the human condition than about law. In one of these litigations a wayward nephew has cheated his elderly aunt out of her savings. In court, the nephew insists the money was a gift, but his aunt explains she only gave him the money as a loan. Although the lawyer technically wins the case, everything of value seems lost in the meantime. His services are paid for in rabbits because the aunt has no currency, and in the end, the nephew cons his aunt into parting with her savings anyway. Other cases expose similar types of petty corruption.